LOUISIANA & ARKANSAS RAILWAY CO.

v.

ROBINSON

Citator

Cited By (16 total)

• N. W. Trailer Sales v. McCANN, 217 So. 2d 310 (Fla. 1968)
  …is not mandatory. The deputy has a discretion to decide whether the additional examination and report are [*312] needed. The statute provides that he “may-designate a disinterested doctor.” Martin v. Tindell, 98 So. 2d 473 (Fla.1957), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 959, 78 S.Ct. 545, 2 L.Ed. 2d 534. Hammersla v. Price, 190 So. 2d 765 (Fla.1966). The statute expressly provides that the report or testimony of the designated doctor shall be made a part of the record. Significantly it is required that it “shall be gi…
• Dunn v. ST. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co., 370 F.2d 681 (10th Cir. 1966)
• Ramsey v. Culpepper, 738 F.2d 1092 (10th Cir. 1984)
  …s that the remarks in question unduly aroused the sympathy of the jury and thereby influenced the verdict.” Julander v. Ford Motor Co., 488 F. 2d 839, 842 (10th Cir.1973); See also Franklin v. Shelton, 250 F. 2d 92, 99 (10th Cir.1957), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 959, 78 S.Ct. 544, 2 L.Ed.2d 533 (1958). Moreover, “[bjecause the trial judge is in the best position to determine the effect that arguments of counsel have upon the jury, considerable discretion is given to the trial judge in exercising supervision ove…