CARROLL

v.

CALIFORNIA

Citator

Cited By

• Pangburn v. Civil Aeronautics Bd., 311 F.2d 349 (1st Cir. 1962)
  …a deterrent sanction, “in the interest of the public,” because. a vital “public interest” was “air safety.” Similarly the Seventh Circuit upheld a deterrent suspension in Hard v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 248 F. 2d 761 (7th Cir., 1957), cert. den., 355 U.S. 960, 78 S.Ct. 543, 2 L.Ed.2d 534 (1958). There the suspension stemmed from an accident in which the petitioner destroyed his aircraft due to poor planning and execution of an approach. There was no finding that he was deficient in technical flying quali…
• GO Leasing, Inc. v. Nat'l Transp. Safety Bd., 800 F.2d 1514 (9th Cir. 1986)
  …s a deterrent sanction, “in the interest of the public,” because a vital “public interest” was “air safety.” Similarly the Seventh Circuit upheld a deterrent suspension in Hard v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 248 F. 2d 761 (7th Cir., 1957), cert. den., 355 U.S. 960, 78 S.Ct. 543, 2 L.Ed.2d 534 (1958).... Since the enactment of the 1958 Act the Board has consistently interpreted it as authorizing a continuation of the previous judicially approved standards and practice of imposing suspension as a disciplinary…
• Pike v. Civil Aeronautics Bd. & Najeeb E. Halaby, 303 F.2d 353 (8th Cir. 1962)
  …commercial pilot who also possesses a flight instructor’s certificate. See Wilson v. C. A. B., 1957, 100 U.S.App.D.C. 325, 244 F. 2d 773, cert. den. 355 U.S. 870, 78 S.Ct. 119, 2 L.Ed.2d 75; Hard v. C. A. B., 7 Cir., 1957, 248 F. 2d 761, cert. den. 355 U.S. 960, 78 S.Ct. 543, 2 L.Ed.2d 534. The issue, then, is whether there has been an exercise of that power. Certainly the statute is not specific. § 101’s definition of “airman”, so far as it is pertinent here, is directed toward a pilot in actual navigatio…