GOLLA

v.

RHODES, WARDEN

Citator

Cited By

• Metzler v. State, 241 So. 2d 172 (Fla. 3d DCA 1970)
  …f the original imprisonment and the principal may be appre [*174] hended by his bondsman even under extreme circumstances.” Illustrating such “extreme circumstances” is Golla v. State of Delaware, 11 Terry 497, 135 A. 2d 137, 139 (1957), cert. den. 355 U.S. 965, 78 S.Ct. 555, 2 L.Ed.2d 539 (1958); see also Golla v. Rhodes, 162 F.Supp. 589 (D.Del., 1958), and see United Bonding Ins. Co. v. City Court of City of Tucson, 6 Ariz.App. 462, 433 P. 2d 642 (1967). Affirmed. . See § 901.05, Fla.Stat.1967, F.S.A.,…
• United States v. Givens, 767 F.2d 574 (9th Cir. 1985)
  …le bank robbery statute, 18 U.S.C. § 2113(d). See Wheeler v. United States, 317 F. 2d 615, 617 (8th Cir.1963); United States v. McGann, 150 F.Supp. 463, 465 (D.Md.), aff'd sub nom. Smith v. United States, 250 F. 2d 37 (4th Cir.1957), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 965, 78 S.Ct. 555, 2 L.Ed.2d 540 (1958). The determination whether a particular weapon is dangerous and puts in jeopardy the life of the mail custodian within the meaning of the statute must be made by the jury. United States [*585] v. Hudson, 564 F.…
• Glendel D. Wheeler v. United States, 317 F.2d 615 (8th Cir. 1963)
  …fact loaded. It is not necessary to allege in the indictment that the dangerous weapon was in fact loaded. United States v. McGann, D.Md.1957, 150 F.Supp. 463, affirmed in Smith v. United States, 4 Cir., 1957, 250 F. 2d 37, certiorari denied, 1958, 355 U.S. 965, 78 S.Ct. 555, 2 L.Ed.2d 540.6 The indictment is sufficient in that it charges the crime in the language of the statute. It is true that the indictment could have charged that the weapon was loaded 7 or the indictment could have charged an assault…