CLARENCE HEATH, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
CLARENCE HEATH, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
183 So. 2d 742
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1966)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
The briefs and the record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the order of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed.
RAWLS, C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD K, and JOHNSON, JJ, concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Hopwood v. Revitz, 312 So. 2d 516 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975)…e trial court has otherwise lost jurisdiction. Davidson v. Stringer, 109 Fla. 238, 147 So. 228 (1933). The Club urges that jurisdiction continued in the trial court to modify its final judgment under the following cases: Clem v. Clem, Fla.App.1966, 183 So. 2d 742; Sapp v. Warner, 105 Fla. 245, 144 So. 481 (1932); State v. Baskin, 111 Fla. 667, 150 So. 517 (1933), and Coggan v. Coggan, Fla.App.1966, 183 So. 2d 839. We think it is clear, however, that the jurisdiction therein referred to does not allow a modif…
-
Lorayne Walsh v. Bermot Walsh, 388 So. 2d 240 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980)…eement the court elevated it to the dignity and effect of a court decree, which it then had continuing jurisdiction to enforce. Mendel, 257 So. 2d at 296. The wife, therefore, properly applied to the court to enforce the agreement. See Clem v. Clem, 183 So. 2d 742 (Fla.3d DCA 1966). Since a court can enforce monetary obligations against a person’s property located inside the boundaries of the state in which it sits without having jurisdiction over the person, there was no reason for the husband to consent to…