HOUSTON BELT & TERMINAL RAILWAY CO. ET AL.
v.
UNITED STATES ET AL.
HOUSTON BELT & TERMINAL RAILWAY CO. ET AL.
UNITED STATES ET AL.
356 U.S. 23
Supreme Court of the United States (1958)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Am. Tel. & Tel. Co. & Associated Bell Sys. Cos. v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n & United States, 449 F.2d 439 (2d Cir. 1971)…the findings and evidence that are required to support the action. Baltimore & O. R.R. v. United States, 277 U.S. 291, 300, 48 S.Ct. 520, 72 L.Ed. 885 (1928) ; Houston Belt & Terminal Ry. v. United States, 153 F.Supp. 3, 7-8 (S.D.Tex. 1957), aff’d, 356 U.S. 23, 78 S.Ct. 560, 2 L.Ed.2d 578 (1958) ; Moss v. CAB, 139 U.S.App.DC. 150, 430 F. 2d 891 (1970). . The Commission attempted to retreat from tliis conclusion in its memorandum opinion and order on reconsideration : “At no point in our decision did we…