MARSHALL
v.
BRUCKER, SECRETARY OF THE ARMY

U.S. | 1958-03-10
No. 41
356 U.S. 24 Supreme Court of the United States (1958) Caution
Also reported at: 2 L. Ed. 2d 578 · 78 S. Ct. 562 · 1958 U.S. LEXIS 1384 · SCDB 1957-068
Cited by 21 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit is reversed and the case is remanded to the District Court for appropriate relief in the light of Harmon v. Brucker and Abramowitz v. Brucker, 355 U. S. 579, decided March 3, 1958.

Dissent
Mr. Justice Clark

Mr. Justice Clark dissents from this disposition of the case for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in these cases.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By (12 total)

  • Trans-Bay Eng'rs & Builders, Inc. v. Hills (D.D.C. 1976)
    …in her official capacity as provided by 12 U.S.C. § 1702. For diversity purposes in such cases, the Secretary’s residence is properly found in Washington, D.C. See Garden Homes v. Mason, 249 F. 2d 71, 73 (1st Cir. 1957), cert. denied, 356 U.S. 903, 78 S.Ct. 562, 2 L.Ed.2d 580 (1958); EMMCO Insurance Co. v. Frankford Trust Co., 352 F.Supp. 130, 133 (E.D. Pa.1972). The Secretary then argues that MORH, the project owner, is an indispensable party defendant, and that the presence of this California corporatio…
  • Jere L. Denton v. Secretary OF the AIR Force, 483 F.2d 21 (9th Cir. 1973)
    …he Supreme Court has exercised jurisdiction and invalidated a discharge on the ground that the Secretary had exceeded his statutory powers. Harmon v. Brucker, 1958, 355 [*25] U.S. 579, 78 S.Ct. 433, 2 L.Ed.2d 503. See also Marshall v. Brucker, 1958, 356 U.S. 24, 78 S.Ct. 562, 2 L.Ed.2d 503. The Court has not, so far as we can discover, spoken directly to this question since. The question presented here differs from that in Harmon, supra. Denton does not assert the kind of misinterpretation of statutory au…
  • Lockheed Aircraft Corp. v. The United States, 375 F.2d 786 (Ct. Cl. 1967)
    …lip op., at p. 14. The Supreme Court has made it quite clear that California could have included the government inventory and work in the personal property tax assessment base. See American Motors Corp. v. City of Kenosha, 356 U.S. 21, 78 S.Ct. 559, 2 L.Ed.2d 578 (1958); City of Detroit v. Murray Corp., 355 U.S. 489, 78 S.Ct. 458, 2 L.Ed.2d 441 (1958); United States v. City of Detroit, 355 U.S. 466, 78 S.Ct. 474, 2 L.Ed.2d 424 (1958); United States v. Township of Muskegon, 355 U.S. 484, 78 S.Ct. 483, 2 L.Ed.…

Previewing 3 of 12 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw