PRATT
v.
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY ET AL.
PRATT
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY ET AL.
356 U.S. 226
Supreme Court of the United States (1958)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Patrocinia L. Vda De Rodulfa v. United States & Adm'r of Veterans Affairs, 461 F.2d 1240 (D.C. Cir. 1972)…nited States v. Daubendiek, 25 F.R.D. 50, 54 (N.D.Iowa 1959); Steinmasel v. United States, 202 F.Supp. 335, 337 (D.S.D.1962). See also the eases cited infra note 99. See also Strong v. United States, 155 F.Supp. 468 (D.Mass. 1957), appeal dismissed, 356 U.S. 226, 78 S.Ct. 709, 2 L.Ed.2d 712 (1958). . Hahn v. Gray, supra note 20, 92 U.S.App.D.C. at 190, 203 F. 2d at 626; Slocumb v. Gray, supra note 16, 86 U.S.App.D.C. at 8, 179 F. 2d at 34; Van Horne v. Hines, supra note 20, 74 App.D.C. at 216, 122 F. 2d at…