MATLES
v.
UNITED STATES

U.S. | 1958-04-07
No. 378
356 U.S. 256 Supreme Court of the United States (1958) Negative Treatment
Also reported at: 2 L. Ed. 2d 741 · 78 S. Ct. 712 · 1958 U.S. LEXIS 1264 · SCDB 1957-077
Cited by 33 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

[*257] Per Curiam.

The petitions for writs of certiorari are granted. In No. 378 the judgment of the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit is reversed and the case is remanded to the District Court with directions to vacate the order holding the petitioner in contempt and to dismiss the complaint. In Nos. 450 and 494 the judgments of the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit are reversed and the cases are remanded to the District Court with directions to dismiss the complaints. An affidavit showing good cause is a prerequisite to the initiation of denaturalization proceedings. The affidavit must be filed with the complaint when the proceedings are instituted. United States v. Zueca, 351 U. S. 91, 99-100.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Costello v. United States, 365 U.S. 265 (U.S. 1961)
    …peals for the Second Circuit reversed on the ground that the Government should have been afforded an opportunity to show that its evidence either was untainted or was admissible [*268] in any event. 247 F. 2d 384. We granted certiorari and reversed, 356 U. S. 256, on a ground not considered below, namely, that the affidavit of good cause, which is a prerequisite to the initiation of denaturalization proceedings under § 340 (a), United States v. Zucca, 351 U. S. 91, was not filed with the complaint. On remand…
    1 / 2
  • Costello v. Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 376 U.S. 120 (U.S. 1964)
    …ng convicted for two crimes. This is unrealistic for two reasons. At the time of the trial, denaturalization proceedings were pending against petitioner. United States v. Costello, 145 F. Supp. 892, reversed, 247 F. 2d 384 (C. A. 2d Cir.), reversed, 356 U. S. 256. He was therefore aware of the deportation implications flowing from conviction on dual counts, and was in a position to bargain as he felt most advantageous to himself. And even more speculative than the question of what the petitioner might have d…
  • Sam Title v. United States, 263 F.2d 28 (9th Cir. 1959)
    …uralization Act of 1952, 66 Stat. 260, 8 U.S.C.A. § 1451. . United States v. Title, D.C.S.D.Cal.1955, 132 F.Supp. 185. . Matles v. United States, No. 378; Luc-chese v. United States, No. 450; and Costello v. United States, No. 494, all reported at 356 U.S. 256, 78 S.Ct. 712, 713, 714, 2 L.Ed.2d 741. . Considered -with Lucchese v. United States and Costello v. United States, supra.…
    1 / 2

Previewing 3 of 10 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw