DANDRIDGE

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Sydney B. Kadwell v. United States, 315 F.2d 667 (9th Cir. 1963)
  …he District Court should not attempt to decide the merits of the proffered defense, thus determining the guilt or innocence of the defendant.” Gearhart v. United States, 106 U.S.App.D.C. 270, 272 F. 2d 499, 502 (1959). . Dandridge v. United States, 356 U.S. 259, 78 S.Ct. 714, 2 L.Ed.2d 757 (1958), discussed in Goarhart v. United States, 10G U.S.App.D.C. 270, 272 F. 2d 499, 502-503 (1959); Poole v. United States, 102 U.S.App.D.C. 71, 250 F. 2d 396, 400 (1957).…
• Gearhart v. United States, 272 F.2d 499 (D.C. Cir. 1959)
  …lvable apart from the merits of the case, the District Court may appropriately hold a factual hearing to determine whether the accused has a “fair and just” reason for asking to withdraw his plea of guilty. Thus, in Dandridge v. United States, 1958, 356 U.S. 259, 78 S.Ct. 714, 2 L.Ed.2d 757, the Solicitor General conceded in the Supreme Court that where the accused seeks to withdraw his plea of guilty on the ground that he was not mentally competent at the time he entered his plea, a hearing on that issue w…
• Miranda v. United States, 458 F.2d 1179 (2d Cir. 1972)
  …opriate because of the length of time between the plea and the hearing below — over two years — and therefore, he should be allowed to withdraw his plea and proceed anew. In support of this contention petitioner relies on Dandridge v. United States, 356 U.S. 259, 78 S.Ct. 714, 2 L.Ed.2d 757 (1958); Dusky v. United States, 362 U.S. 402, 80 S.Ct. 788, 4 L.Ed.2d 824 (1960); and Pate v. Robinson, 383 U.S. 375, 86 S.Ct. 836, 15 L.Ed.2d 815 (1966), in which the Supreme Court, recognizing the difficulties inherent…