GEORGIA ET AL.
v.
UNITED STATES ET AL.
GEORGIA ET AL.
UNITED STATES ET AL.
356 U.S. 273
Supreme Court of the United States (1958)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Tampa Phosphate R.R. Co. v. Seaboard Coast Line R.R. Co., 418 F.2d 387 (5th Cir. 1969)…Chicago, Milwaukee, St. P. & P. R. Co. v. United States, E.D.Wis., 1963, 214 F. Supp. 244, reversed on other grounds, 380 U.S. 448, 85 S.Ct. 1102, 14 L.Ed.2d 151; State of Georgia v. United States, N.D.Ga., 1957, 156 F.Supp. 711, aff’d per curiam, 356 U.S. 273, 78 S.Ct. 771, 2 L.Ed.2d 760. With the way open for direct review of the validity of the Commission’s order in a statutory three judge court, the question is raised whether such court is the exclusive forum for the adjudication of jurisdictional qu…