CHAUFFEURS, TEAMSTERS & HELPERS LOCAL UNION 795 ET AL.

v.

NEWELL, DOING BUSINESS AS EL DORADO DAIRY

Citator

Cited By

• Police Dep't of the City of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92 (U.S. 1972)
  …exclusions [*99] from a public forum must be carefully scrutinized. Because picketing plainly involves expressive conduct within the protection of the First Amendment, see, e. g., Thornhill v. Alabama, 310 U. S. 88 (1940); Teamsters Union v. Newell, 356 U. S. 341 (1958); Garner v. Louisiana, 368 U. S. 157, 185 (1961) (Harlan, J., concurring in judgment); Edwards v. South Carolina, 372 U. S. 229 (1963); Cox v. Louisiana, supra, at 546; Food Employees v. Logan Valley Plaza, 391 U. S. 308, 314-315 (1968); id.,…
• Int'l Ass'n of MacHinists v. Street, 367 U.S. 740 (U.S. 1961)
  …ttee of Senate Committee on Banking and Currency on S. 2408, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. 53-62 (1950); Loss, op. cit., supra, 620, 621. To this extent Thornhill v. Alabama, 310 U. S. 88, 101-106, has survived and was applied in Chauffeurs Union v. Newell, 356 U. S. 341. See Cox, Internal Affairs of Labor Unions Under the Labor Reform Act of 1959, 58 Mich. L. Rev. 819, 829-851. 1 Commons, History of Labor in the United States, 318-325 (1918). Taft, The A. F. of L. in the Time of Gompers, 289-292 (1957); Bakke an…
• Nat'l Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Claiborne Hardware Co., 458 U.S. 886 (U.S. 1982)
  …he picketing “was concededly to advise customers and prospective customers of the relationship existing between the employer and its employees and thereby to induce such customers not to patronize the employer.” Id., at 99. Cf. Chauffeurs v. Newell, 356 U. S. 341. In Edwards v. South Carolina, 372 U. S. 229, we held that a peaceful march and demonstration was protected by the rights of free speech, free assembly, and freedom to petition for a redress of grievances. Speech itself also was used to further the…

Authorities Cited

• Thornhill v. Alabama, 310 U.S. 88 (U.S. 1940)