FOLSOM, SECRETARY OF HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND WELFARE,

v.

FLORIDA CITRUS EXCHANGE ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Nw. States Portland Cement Co. v. Minnesota, 358 U.S. 450 (U.S. 1959)
  …213 Ga. 713, 719, 101 S. E. 2d 197, 201. And it held that § 92-3113, as applied, violated the Commerce Clause of the Constitution. It thereupon reversed the judgment, 213 Ga. 713, 101 S. E. 2d 197, and we granted Georgia’s petition for certiorari. 356 U. S. 911. I submit that these simple recitals clearly show (1) that the Minnesota and Georgia statutes, in plain terms, purport to tax income derived “exclusively [from] [*483] interstate commerce,” (2) that the Minnesota and Georgia courts have found that…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• United States v. Fierson, 419 F.2d 1020 (7th Cir. 1969)
  …as been shown in this case. Concluding that the majority opinion conflicts with our recent decision in United States v. Marine, 413 F. 2d 214 (7th Cir. 1969),* and with Whaley v. United States, 324 F. 2d 356, 358 (9th Cir. 1963), certiorari denied, 356 U.S. 911, 84 S.Ct. 665, 11 L.Ed.2d 609, I would affirm. * The majority opinion distinguishes the Marine case on the ground that there the defendant disputed the issue of knowledge (note 7, supra) but here defense counsel questioned defendant’s intent. More…
• Flemming v. Fla. Citrus Exch., 358 U.S. 153 (U.S. 1958)
  …as required to certify Red 32 as a safe color for use on oranges without one. Id., at 860-862. We granted certiorari to determine this controversial question of construction of this important statute designed for the protection of the public health. 356 U. S. 911. Senate and House Committees have reported that the practice of adding color is an economic necessity in the production of Florida and Texas oranges for market.8 When mature oranges are removed from the tree, their skins, for botanical reasons unne…