CAUDLE

v.

UNITED STATES; AND CONNELLY V. UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (25 total)

• United States v. Mandujano, 425 U.S. 564 (U.S. 1976)
  …indict); United States v. Grunewald, 233 [*600] F. 2d 556, 576 n. 10 (CA2 1956) (Frank, J., dissenting in part), rev’d, 353 U. S. 391 (1957) (warning required for any witness); Connelly v. United States, 249 F. 2d 576, 581 (CA8 1957), cert. denied, 356 U. S. 921 (1958) (approving suppression of all testimony, even in presence of warnings, after point prosecutor decided to indict); United States v. Nickels, 502 F. 2d 1173, 1176 (CA7 1974), cert. pending, No. 74-735 (by implication Miranda warning required fo…
• Carbo v. United States, 314 F.2d 718 (9th Cir. 1963)
  …. All motions were denied and Judge Boldt proceeded to impose sentence. This is assigned as abuse of discretion. Appellants rely heavily upon dicta in Connelly v. United States, 8 Cir., 1957, 249 F. 2d 576, 580, cert. den., Caudle v. United States, 356 U.S. 921, 78 S.Ct. 700, 2 L.Ed.2d 716 (1958), reh. den., 354 U.S. 964, 78 S.Ct. 991, 2 L.Ed.2d 1072 (1958), where, in upholding a successor judge’s decision that he could properly proceed, the court stated: “There might well be a criminal case in which the…
• Isaacs v. United States, 301 F.2d 706 (8th Cir. 1962)
  …esolve, and not one of law to be determined by the courts. See and compare Brennan v. United States, 8 Cir., 240 F. 2d 253, 259, cert. den. 353 U.S. 931, 77 S.Ct. 718, 1 L.Ed. 2d 723; Connelly v. United States, 8 Cir., 249 F. 2d 576, 585, cert. den. 356 U.S. 921, 78 S.Ct. 700, 2 L.Ed.2d 716; Northcraft v. United States, 8 Cir., 271 F. 2d 184, 187. The existence of an overall scheme finds support in the scope and magnitude of the fraudulent conduct. It extended to a substantial portion of the Company’s prop…