BROWN

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Dane, 570 F.2d 840 (9th Cir. 1977)
  …. Lara, 472 F. 2d 128, 129 (9th Cir. 1972); Trueblood Longknife v. United States, 381 F. 2d 17, 19 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 926, 88 S.Ct. 859, 19 L.Ed.2d 987 (1967); Brown v. United States, 236 F. 2d 253, 254 (9th Cir. 1956), cert. denied, 356 U.S. 922, 78 S.Ct. 705, 2 L.Ed.2d 716 (1958). Indeed, because the focus of review is on abuse of discretion rather than violation of conditions, we have held that where the nature of the probationer’s acts warranted revocation within the guidelines set out i…
• Hobart v. United States, 275 F.2d 941 (9th Cir. 1960)
  …held and the judgment affirmed if sentence imposed does not exceed that prescribed for any one count, and the evidence sufficiently sustains conviction upon that count.” Donaldson v. United States, 9 Cir., 1957, 248 F. 2d 364, 367, certiorari denied 356 U.S. 922, 78 S.Ct. 706, 2 L.Ed.2d 717. By analogy the general rule may properly be applied here.…
• Stanfield v. Swenson, 381 F.2d 755 (8th Cir. 1967)
  …d, does not render the entire judgment void, because the portion of the sentence which is contrary to law will be treated as surplusage and disregarded. * * * ” The United States Supreme Court denied certiorari, Campbell v. State of Missouri, 1958, 356 U.S. 922, 78 S.Ct. 708, 2 L.Ed.2d 718. In State v. Hicks, Mo., 1964, 376 S.W. 2d 160, the Supreme Court of Missouri reaffirmed its earlier holding in Campbell by providing that a sentence imposed for driving while intoxicated on a defendant already under se…