NEUBAUER

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Fleming v. United States, 344 F.2d 912 (10th Cir. 1965)
  …selective service registrant claiming such an exemption has the burden of clearly establishing his right thereto. Dickinson v. United States, 346 U.S. 389, 74 S.Ct. 152, 98 L.Ed. 132; Bouziden v. United States, 10 Cir., 251 F. 2d 728, cert. denied, 356 U.S. 927, 78 S.Ct. 716, 2 L.Ed.2d 759; Bradshaw v. United States, 10 Cir., 242 F. 2d 180. It is not the province of the courts to weigh the evidence on which a local draft board classifies any particular registrant for the purpose of determining if he has me…
• Touche Ross & Co. v. Sec. & Exch. Comm'n, 609 F.2d 570 (2d Cir. 1979)
  …957) (district court upheld authority of Commission to proceed under Rule 2(e), affirmed on other grounds, 251 F. 2d 919 (D.C.Cir.) (denial of injunction affirmed but on ground that appellant failed to exhaust administrative remedies), cert. denied, 356 U.S. 927 (1958). [*579] Other courts, although not squarely ruling on the question, nevertheless have intimated that the Commission has the authority to promulgate Rule 2(e) and to discipline professionals who appear before it. See, e. g., SEC v. Csapo, 533…
• United States v. Hoffman, 733 F.2d 596 (9th Cir. 1984)
  …er courts will not find a per se violation of the Constitution where there is a defect in counsel’s bar status. For example, in United States v. Bradford, 238 F. 2d 395 (2d Cir.1956), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 1002, 77 S.Ct. 558, 1 L.Ed.2d 546 (1957) & 356 U.S. 927 (1958), the Second Circuit declined to follow a per se rule and held that the defendant’s right to counsel was not violated because he was represented in federal district court in New York by a member of the New York State Bar who had failed to make…