EDWARDS

v.

DOCTORS HOSPITAL, INC., ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Williams et ux. v. LEE, 358 U.S. 217 (U.S. 1959)
  …civil suits by non-Indians against Indians though the action arises on an Indian reservation. 83 Ariz. 241, 319 P. 2d 998. Because this was a doubtful determination of the important question of state power over Indian affairs, we granted certiorari. 356 U. S. 930. Originally the Indian tribes were separate nations within what is now the United States. Through conquest and treaties they were induced to give up complete independence and the right to go to war in exchange for federal protection, aid, and grant…
• Indep. Iron Works, Inc. v. United States Steel Corp., 322 F.2d 656 (9th Cir. 1963)
  …he result that defendants’ cost bills were filed out of time and should have been disallowed in their entirety. In support of its argument, plaintiff relies principally upon Edwards v. Doctors Hosp., Inc., 242 F. 2d 888 (2d Cir. 1957), cert. denied, 356 U.S. 930, 78 S.Ct. 770, 2 L.Ed.2d 761 (1958). There the question was, when did the time for appeal commence. It appears from the opinion that the trial judge had directed a verdict and ordered the suit dismissed. The clerk immediately made a docket entry to…
• Stirling v. Chem. Bank, 511 F.2d 1030 (2d Cir. 1975)
  …district court to grant an extension of time nunc pro tunc and dismissal of a notice of appeal filed more than 60 days after entry of judgment would be mandated. See Edwards v. Doctors Hospital Inc., 242 F. 2d 888, 891 (2d Cir. 1957), cert. denied, 356 U.S. 930, 78 S.Ct. 770, 2 L.Ed.2d 761 (1958).1 Here, however, the filing of the notice of appeal within 60 days, coupled with a prima facie showing of excusable neglect, and the timely service of the notice of appeal on the opposing parties, constituted a su…