ELLIOTT ET AL.

v.

METROPOLITAN CASUALTY INSURANCE CO. OF NEW YORK ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (19 total)

• Am. Fire & Cas. Co. v. Collura, 163 So. 2d 784 (Fla. 2d DCA 1964)
  …Metropolitan Casualty Ins. Co. v. Richardson, D.C.S.D.Ill.1948, 81 F.Supp. 310; Marcum v. State Auto. Mut. Ins. Co., 1950, 134 W.Va. 144, 59 S.E. 2d 433; Elliott v. Metropolitan Casualty Ins. Co. of New York, 10 Cir. 1957, 250 F. 2d 680 (Cert. den. 356 U.S. 932, 78 S.Ct. 774, 2 L.Ed.2d 762). Those decisions, however, are not exactly on point here, because in the second suit in which the judgment was obtained Stephens neither voluntarily submitted himself to the jurisdiction of the court nor answered with…
• McCULLOUGH Tool Co. v. Well Surveys, Inc., 343 F.2d 381 (10th Cir. 1965)
  …sufficient to render a patent invalid. Consolidated Fruit Jar Co. v. Wright, 94 U.S. 92, 24 L.Ed. 68. But not every use is a public use within the meaning of the statute. Hobbs v. Wisconsin Power & Light Company, 7 Cir., 250 F. 2d 100, cert. denied, 356 U.S. 932, 78 S.Ct. 774, 2 L.Ed.2d 762. The good faith use of the device or apparatus for experimental purposes is not a public use within the intent and meaning of the statute. Merrill v. Builders Ornamental Iron Co., 10 Cir., 197 F. 2d 16; Nicholson v. Carl…
• Indep. Iron Works, Inc. v. United States Steel Corp., 322 F.2d 656 (9th Cir. 1963)
  …did later. And when we do so, we find that the record they made * * * shows unmistakable intent by the district judge to make a judgment [at a later time].” Cedar Creek Oil & Gas Co. v. Fidelity Gas Co., 238 F. 2d 298 (9th Cir. 1956), cert. denied, 356 U.S. 932, 78 S.Ct. 775, 2 L.Ed.2d 763 (1958); Accord, United States v. F. & M. Schaefer Brewing Co., 356 U.S. 227, 235, 78 S.Ct. 674, 2 L.Ed.2d 721 (1958). Moreover, local Rule 21 (now Rule 44) of the District Court requires that a judgment must be embodied…