THOMPSON

v.

MARYLAND

Citator

Cited By

• Bowles v. United States, 439 F.2d 536 (D.C. Cir. 1970)
  …decided to invoke his Fifth Amendment privilege. We have considered other contentions presented by appellant’s counsel.7 We find no reason for reversal. Affirmed. . Accardo v. United States, 102 U.S.App.D.C. 4, 249 F. 2d 519 (1957), cert. denied, 356 U.S. 943, 78 S.Ct. 787, 2 L.Ed.2d 817 (1958); Bullock v. United States, (No. 22,480, March 17, 1970). . Even so this evidence of the appearance of the scene is not as probative on the issue of intent as the earmarks of a plan to rob, manifesting themselves…
• Harrison v. United States, 387 F.2d 203 (D.C. Cir. 1967)
  …341, 60 S.Ct. 266, 84 L.Ed. 307 (1939). . See supra, note 1; Harrison v. United States, supra note 5, 123 U.S.App.D.C. at 236 n. 17, 359 F. 2d at 220 n. 17. . Compare Accardo v. United States, 102 U.S.App.D.C. 4, 249 F. 2d 519 (1957), cert. denied 356 U.S. 943, 78 S.Ct. 787, 2 L.Ed.2d 817 (1958). . A Government witness residing across the street from Brown’s house saw a male come out of Brown’s doorway immediately after the shot “and put something under his coat, a gun, and ran down the street * * * . S…
• Starr v. United States, 264 F.2d 377 (D.C. Cir. 1958)
  …regarding release mandatory for the future, eliminate the public safety component. It expressly included it. So does the statute. See my dissent in Tatum v. United States, 1957, 101 U.S.App.D.C. 373, 377, 249 F. 2d 129, 133, certiorari denied 1958, 356 U.S. 943, 78 S.Ct. 788, 2 L.Ed.2d 818, and Bradley v. United States, supra. The effect of the present majority decision is that, in [*385] cases tried before Lyles, the public safety component was unnecessary. Since, by this time, there cannot be very many…