BAKER

v.

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BOARD OF PAROLE ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Gordon v. United States, 438 F.2d 858 (5th Cir. 1971)
  …, 82 S.Ct. at 472 (emphasis added). . 325 F. 2d 274 (5th Cir. 1963). . 290 F. 2d 515 (6th Cir. 1961). . See: Cuozzo v. United States, 325 F. 2d 274 (5th Cir. 1963). . 159 F.Supp. 208 (S.D.N.Y.1957), affd. 252 F. 2d 780 (2d Cir. 1958), cert. den. 356 U.S. 944, 78 S.Ct. 791, 2 L.Ed.2d 819. . Id. at 212. . In Green v. United States, 365 U.S. 301 at 305, 81 S.Ct. 653 at 655, the Court emphasized that: Trial judges before sentencing should, as a matter of good judicial administration, unambiguously addres…
• Birchfield v. United States, 296 F.2d 120 (5th Cir. 1961)
  …255 “is inadequate or ineffective to test the legality of his detention,” 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255. The assertions made here present, of course, a classic case of the situation envisaged by § 2255. Lampe v. Clemmer, 4 Cir., 1958, 251 F. 2d 465, cert. den. 356 U.S. 944, 78 S.Ct. 791, 2 L.Ed.2d 820; Neigut v. Kearney, 5 Cir., 1955, 221 F. 2d 803, cert. den., 350 U.S. 939, 76 S.Ct. 311, 100 L.Ed. 819; Overman v. Wilkinson, 5 Cir., 1958, 256 F. 2d 58, cert. den., 358 U.S. 887, 79 S.Ct. 129, 3 L.Ed.2d 115; Smith v. Re…
• United States v. Barnes, 948 F.2d 325 (7th Cir. 1991)
  …ng the defendant to speak. See Gordon v. United States, 438 F. 2d 858 (5th Cir.1971); Sandroff v. United States, 174 F. 2d 1014, 1020 (6th Cir.1949); Hardy v. United States, 159 F.Supp. 208 (S.D.N.Y.1957), aff'd, 252 F. 2d 780 (2d Cir.), cert. den., 356 U.S. 944, 78 S.Ct. 791, 2 L.Ed.2d 819 (1958). Under this approach, the trial court must genuinely reconsider the sentence in light of the elicited statement. See United States v. Pelaez, 930 F. 2d 520 (6th Cir.1991) (remanding case in which defendant granted…