STOKES

v.

TRAVELERS INSURANCE CO.

Citator

Cited By

• Hobart Bros. Co. v. Malcolm T. Gilliland, Inc., 471 F.2d 894 (5th Cir. 1973)
  …mith Citrus Products Co. v. Sunkist Growers, Inc., 9 Cir., 1965, 346 F. 2d 1012, 1014, cert. denied 382 U.S. 958, 86 S.Ct. 433, 15 L.Ed.2d 362; E.V. Prentice Machine Company v. Associated Plywood Mills, 9 Cir., 1958, 252 F. 2d 473, 477, cert. denied 356 U.S. 951, 78 S.Ct. 917, 2 L.Ed.2d 844; Flintkote Company v. Lysfjord, 9 Cir., 1957, 246 F. 2d 368, 392, cert. denied 355 U.S. 835, 78 S.Ct. 54, 2 L.Ed.2d 46; and Ford Motor Company v. Webster’s Auto Sales, Inc., 1 Cir., 1966, 361 F. 2d 874, 883. Gilliland a…
• Ford Motor Co. v. Webster's Auto Sales, Inc., 361 F.2d 874 (1st Cir. 1966)
  …ered legal injury and incurred damages in some ascertainable amount as a result of defendant’s unlawful conduct. As stated by the court in E. V. Prentice Machinery Co. v. Associated Plywood Mills, Inc., 252 F. 2d 473, 477 (9th Cir. 1958), cert. den. 356 U.S. 951, 78 S.Ct. 917, 2 L.Ed.2d 844 (1958): Regarding the quantum of proof required to establish the fact of damage, the rule is that the plaintiff is required to establish with reasonable probability the existence of some causal connection between defend…
• Tenn. Valley Sand & Gravel Co. v. M/V Delta, 598 F.2d 930 (5th Cir. 1979)
  …s made at times of crisis are subject to human error. We do not require “infallibility or exactness of mathematical formula,” Cargill, Inc. v. The Frank A. Lowery, N.D. N.Y.1957, 159 F.Supp. 133, 134, aff’d, 2 Cir. 1958, 251 F. 2d 845, cert. denied, 356 U.S. 951, 78 S.Ct. 917, 2 L.Ed.2d 845, and will allow the injured party a wide latitude in determining how best to deal with the situation. See, e. g., Ellerman Lines, Ltd. v. The President Harding, supra, 288 F. 2d at 290; W. R. Grace & Co. v. Charleston L…