MARQUEZ ET AL.

v.

AVILES

Citator

Cited By

• Burns v. Swenson, 430 F.2d 771 (8th Cir. 1970)
  …allenge: The alleged invidious discrimination must be against one person in favor of another person or class of persons, with no rational basis for any differentiation in treatment. See Marquez v. Aviles, 252 F. 2d 715, 717 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 356 U.S. 952, 78 S.Ct. 917, 2 L.Ed.2d 845 (1958); Everlasting Development Corp. v. Sol Luis Descartes, 192 F. 2d 1, 7 (1st Cir.1951), cert. denied, 342 U.S. 954, 72 S.Ct. 626, 96 L.Ed. 709 (1952). The equal protection doctrine is rooted in a comparison of the a…
• Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Caledonia Inv. Corp., 862 F.2d 378 (1st Cir. 1988)
  …Norton v. Mathews, 427 U.S. 524, 532 (1976); Secretary of the Navy v. Avrech, 418 U.S. 676, 677-78 (1974) (per curiam); In re Pioneer Ford Sales, Inc., 729 F. 2d 27, 31 (1st Cir.1984); Marquez v. Aviles, 252 F. 2d 715, 718 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 356 U.S. 952 (1958). III. Appellant’s claims on appeal are based primarily on a number of arguments that can be reduced to the following: First, appellant argued in the district court that the acceleration notice was invalid for failure to comply with the noti…
• Caribbean Transp. Sys., Inc. v. Autoridad DE LAS Navieras de Puerto RICO, 901 F.2d 196 (1st Cir. 1990)
  …ming, however, that we possess appellate jurisdiction, we find those arguments without merit. See Norton v. Mathews, 427 U.S. 524, 531-32, 96 S.Ct. 2771, 2775-76, 49 L.Ed.2d 672 (1976); Marquez v. Aviles, 252 F. 2d 715, 718 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 356 U.S. 952, 78 S.Ct. 917, 2 L.Ed.2d 845 (1958). Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure permits a court to dismiss an action if the plaintiff fails “to prosecute or to comply with these rules or any order of court.” Although we recognize that dismis…