LOCAL 24, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, CHAUFFEURS, WAREHOUSEMEN & HELPERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO, ET AL.

v.

OLIVER ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Local 24 v. Oliver, 358 U.S. 283 (U.S. 1959)
  …Ohio St. 299, 147 N. E. 2d 856. We granted certiorari to consider the important question raised of the interaction of state and federal power arising from the petitioners’ claim that the Ohio regulation abridges rights protected by federal statute. 356 U. S. 966. Article XXXII did not originate with the 1955 agreement. The carriers and the union have disputed since 1938 the terms of a carrier’s hire of a lessor’s driving services with his leased vehicle. The usual lease is by the owner of a single vehicle…
• Cammarano et ux. v. United States, 358 U.S. 498 (U.S. 1959)
  …Regulations are a valid exercise of the Commissioner’s rule-making power. We granted certio-rari because of the recurring nature of the question, and because of its importance to the proper administration of the Internal Revenue laws. 355 U. S. 952; 356 U. S. 966. A brief review of the facts in the two cases is necessary to an understanding of the issues. No. 29: In 1948 petitioners William and Louise Cam-marano, husband and wife, jointly owned a one-fourth interest in a partnership engaged in the distribu…
• Review Comm. v. Willey, 275 F.2d 264 (8th Cir. 1960)
  …regulations, which we have found to be valid, to this plaintiff. The Review Committee is the trier of fact. Its findings, if supported by substantial evidence, are conclusive. § 1366. Crolley v. Tatton, 5 Cir., 249 F. 2d 908, 911; certiorari denied 356 U.S. 966, 78 5. Ct. 1005, 2 L.Ed.2d 1073. And “substantial evidence” in these cases under the Act does not mean proof beyond a reasonable doubt but only such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept to support a conclusion, Lee v. DeBerry, 219 S.C…