RAILWAY EXPRESS AGENCY, INC.,

v.

RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (19 total)

• Harris v. Pa. R.R. Co., 361 U.S. 15 (U.S. 1959)
  …t. Louis, 351 U. S. 953. Lupo v. Norfolk & Western R. Co., 352 U. S. 891. Collins v Atlantic Coast Line R. Co., 352 U. S. 942. Bennett v. Southern R. Co., 353 U. S. 958. Kelly v. Pennsylvania R. Co., 355 U. S. 892. Dessi v. Pennsylvania R. Co., 356 U. S. 967. Baum v. Baltimore & Ohio R. Co., 358 U. S. 881. B.. Where lower court sustained a jury verdict for the employer: Jones v. Illinois Terminal R. Co., 347 U. S. 956. Conser v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe R. Co., 348 U. S. 828. Metrakos v. Cleveland…
• Ellis v. Great Sw. Corp., 646 F.2d 1099 (5th Cir. 1981)
  …ht within the time allowed by [the foreign state’s] statute no right of action can be maintained even though the law of [Texas] provides for a longer period of limitations.” California v. Copus, 158 Tex. 196, 201, 309 S.W. 2d 227, 231, cert. denied, 356 U.S. 967, 78 S.Ct. 1006, 2 L.Ed.2d 1074 (1958). See also Franco v. Allstate Insurance Co., 505 S.W. 2d 789, 792 (Tex.1974); Gaston v. B. F. Walker, Inc., 400 F. 2d 671, 673 (5th Cir. 1968) (applying Texas law). See generally R. Weintraub, Commentary on th…
• Koonce v. Quaker Safety Prods. & Mfg. Co., 798 F.2d 700 (5th Cir. 1986)
  …nk it plain that even with regard to pre-dissolution claims, TBCA article 7.12 provides the sort of limitations which vitiates the right, not just the remedy. See State of California v. Copus, 158 Tex. 196, 309 S.W. 2d 227, 231 (1958), cert. denied, 356 U.S. 967, 78 S.Ct. 1006, 2 L.Ed.2d 1074 (1958); Jamerson v. Miles, 421 F.Supp. 107, 111 (N.D.Tex.1976). The three-year period is built into article 7.12 itself, and article 7.12 forms the sole basis for the post-dissolution existence of rights against the fo…