DAVIS ET AL.

v.

FOREMAN ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (14 total)

• Sparkman v. McFARLIN, 601 F.2d 261 (7th Cir. 1979)
  …he affirmance of the dismissal of a civil rights claim, involving for the most part immune judges or judicial officers, for failure to allege the conspiracy with sufficient specificity: Davis v. Foreman, 251 F. 2d 421, 422 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 356 U.S. 974, 78 S.Ct. 1137, 2 L.Ed.2d 1148 (1958) (“The Civil Rights Act does not protect one from invasion of private rights by individual action . unless two or more persons conspire . . .. [T]he complaint totally fails to allege any facts which would confer…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Dieu v. Norton, 411 F.2d 761 (7th Cir. 1969)
  …ngaged in which were reasonably related to the promotion of the claimed conspiracy.” Powell v. Workmen’s Compensation Bd. of State of New York, 2 Cir., 327 F. 2d 131, 137 (1964). See Davis v. Foreman, 7 Cir., 251 F. 2d 421, 422 (1958), cert. denied, 356 U.S. 974, 78 S.Ct. 1137, 2 L. Ed.2d 1148. Finally, it becomes apparent that the district court had no jurisdiction to render a money judgment against S. S. Kresge Co., an added defendant in the amended complaint below. Further, we have no jurisdiction to aw…
• Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Adams, 513 F.2d 355 (5th Cir. 1975)
  …gs, and it would be somewhat strange for a producer to pay Phillips for performing the pipeline company’s own regulatory obligations. . The case of Le Cuno Oil Co. v. Smith, Tex. Civ.App.1957, 306 S.W. 2d 190, writ ref’d n.r.e., cert. denied, 1958, 356 U.S. 974, 78 S.Ct. 1137, 2 L.Ed.2d 1147, is a classic unjust enrichment case, although the court preferred to use the terminology of “windfall or excessive allowance.”…