NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
v.
MILK DRIVERS AND DAIRY EMPLOYEES LOCAL UNIONS NOS. 338 AND 680, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, CHAUFFEURS, WAREHOUSEMEN AND HELPERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO

U.S. | 1958-06-23
No. 412
The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Black, and Mr. Justice Douglas dissent for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion of Mr. Justice Douglas in these cases.
357 U.S. 345 Supreme Court of the United States (1958) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 2 L. Ed. 2d 1367 · 78 S. Ct. 1367 · 1958 U.S. LEXIS 1804 · SCDB 1957-135
Cited by 18 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed on the authority of Local 1976, United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, AFL, et al. v. National Labor Relations Board; National Labor Relations Board v. General Drivers, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers Union, Local No. 886, AFL-CIO; and Local 850, International Association of Machinists, AFL-CIO, v. National Labor Relations Board, all decided together June 16, 1958, and reported ante, p. 93.

The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Black, and Mr. Justice Douglas dissent for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion of Mr. Justice Douglas in these cases.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • United States v. Santore, 290 F.2d 51 (2d Cir. 1960)
    …ommit the crime and that he only provided the defendant with an opportunity which the latter was ready and willing to take advantage of. Masciale v. United States, 1958, 356 U.S. 386, 78 S.Ct. 827, 2 L.Ed.2d 859, rehearing denied 1958, 357 U.S. 933, 78 S.Ct. 1367, 2 L.Ed.2d 1375. Santore further maintains that even if he was not entrapped with respect to the first sale, we must find that the agents’ “continued inducement” of him to arrange sale after sale entrapped him. True, the agents expressed dissatisfa…
  • Washington v. United States, 275 F.2d 687 (5th Cir. 1960)
    …the Supreme Court again fully considered the defense of entrapment. Sherman v. United States, 1958, 356 U.S. 369, 78 S.Ct. 819, 2 L.Ed.2d 848; Masciale v. United States, 1958, 356 U.S. 386, 78 S.Ct. 827, 2 L.Ed.2d 859, rehearing denied 357 U.S. 933, 78 S.Ct. 1367, 2 L.Ed.2d 1375. Under Sorrells, Sherman, and Masciale, the issue of entrapment is a question for the jury, unless as a matter of law the defendant has established beyond a reasonable doubt that he was entrapped. See Accardi v. United States, 5 Cir.…
    1 / 2
  • Chavez v. Dickson, 280 F.2d 727 (9th Cir. 1960)
    …cript of the remainder of the trial consisting of 2,912 pages. The exhibits which were received at the trial and the tape recording to which reference will be made below were not lodged with the court. . See, also, Rogers v. Richmond, 357 U.S. 220, 78 S.Ct. 1367, 2 L.Ed.2d 1361; Townsend v. Sain, 359 U.S. 64, 79 S.Ct. 655, 3 L.Ed.2d 643. . Brown v. Allen, supra, 344 U.S. at page 487, 73 S.Ct. 397, 97 L.Ed. 469; Application of Hodge, 9 Cir., 262 F. 2d 778, 782; Daugharty v. Gladden, 9 Cir., 257 F. 2d 750, 7…

Previewing 3 of 9 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw