W. L. CASTER, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
W. L. CASTER, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
183 So. 2d 858
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1966)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
The appellant brings for review the denial of his motion for relief pursuant to Criminal Procedure Rule I, F.S.A. ch. 924-Appendix. We have examined the petition and the brief filed in support of the appeal. The allegations of the motion, if proved, would not constitute grounds for relief under the rule. The trial judge correctly denied the motion.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Thompson v. State, 187 So. 2d 363 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966)…ea. We have examined the record and briefs in support of the respective parties, and find no error in the action of the trial judge in light of the principles announced in: Rankin v. State, Fla.App. 1964, 168 So. 2d 324; Hunt v. State, Fla.App.1966, 183 So. 2d 858; Taylor v. State, Fla.App.1966, 183 So. 2d 865; Whitney v. State, Fla.App. 1966, 184 So. 2d 207. Therefore, the order here under review is (hereby affirmed. Affirmed.…
-
McGRUDER v. State, 203 So. 2d 345 (Fla. 3d DCA 1967)…PER CURIAM. Affirmed on the authority of Taylor v. State, Fla.App.1966, 183 So. 2d 865; Hunt v. State, Fla.App. 1966, 183 So. 2d 858.…
-
Wells v. State, 197 So. 2d 20 (Fla. 2d DCA 1967)…of the same prisoner.” There is also considerable case law to this effect. See Rankin v. State (Fla.App.1964) 168 So. 2d 324; Carpenter v. State (Fla.App.1965) 176 So. 2d 610; Hall v. State (Fla.App.1966) 183 So. 2d 277; Hunt v. State (Fla.App.1966) 183 So. 2d 858, and Thompson v. State (Fla.App.1966) 187 So. 2d 363. The order appealed from is accordingly .affirmed. SHANNON, Acting C. J., and PIERCE and HOBSON, JJ., concur.…