JOINES
v.
UNITED STATES
JOINES
UNITED STATES
357 U.S. 573
Supreme Court of the United States (1958)
Caution
Also reported at: 2 L. Ed. 2d 1547 · 78 S. Ct. 1380 · 1958 U.S. LEXIS 1929 · SCDB 1957-154
Cited by 28 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit is vacated and the case is remanded for consideration in light of No. 331, Jones v. United States, ante, p. 493, decided this day.
Mr. Justice Burton and Mr. Justice Clark dissent for the reasons set forth in the dissenting opinion in No. 331, decided this day.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (15 total)
-
MacKENNA v. Ellis, 280 F.2d 592 (5th Cir. 1960)…many important cases which have been argued before this Court and the Supreme Court o'f the United States, e.g., Indiviglio et al. v. United States, 5 Cir., 1957, 249 F. 2d 549, 551, reversed by the Supreme Court, 1958, 357 U.S. 574, 78 S.Ct. 1381, 2 L.Ed.2d 1547. . “The evidence is that before these lawyers were .appointed that MacKenna beckoned to them and they went over and talked to him in the courtroom in Dallas County, that later the same morning they were appointed to represent him. It is the testimo…
-
United States v. Santa, 236 F.3d 662 (11th Cir. 2000)…, "that no opinion can be considered as binding authority unless the case calls for its expression.” Indiviglio v. United States, 249 F. 2d 549, 561 (5th Cir.1957), rev’d on other grounds by Indiviglio v. United States, 357 U.S. 574, 78 S.Ct. 1381, 2 L.Ed.2d 1547 (1958). As the court’s statement in Nixon was unnecessary to its decision, it is a dictum and does not control our decision in this case. . We note that this language most often appears in cases dealing with "stale” search warrants, i.e., warrants…
-
Henderson v. United States, 261 F.2d 909 (5th Cir. 1958)…n, be reserved for the hapless victims referred to by the Governor of New York. . See dissenting opinion in Shurman v. United States, 5 Cir., 233 F. 2d 272, 280, footnote 6. . And cf. Indiviglio v. United States, 1958, 357 U.S. 574, 78 S.Ct. 1381, 2 L. Ed.2d 1547, reversing our decision reported in 249 F. 2d 549; and Giordonello v. United States, 1958, 357 U.S. 480, 78 S.Ct. 1245, 2 L.Ed.2d 1503, reversing our decision reported in 241 F. 2d 575; and see Gilmore v. United States, 5 Cir., 1958, 256 F. 2d 565.…
Previewing 3 of 15 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence