HOUSE
v.
GRIMES, SHERIFF; GIROUX V. LANGLOIS, ACTING WARDEN; AND SANDERS V. MADIGAN, WARDEN, ET AL.
HOUSE
GRIMES, SHERIFF; GIROUX V. LANGLOIS, ACTING WARDEN; AND SANDERS V. MADIGAN, WARDEN, ET AL.
357 U.S. 916
Supreme Court of the United States (1958)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 8 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (U.S. 1962)…d of Supervisors, 339 U. S. 940; Remmey v. Smith, 342 U. S. 916; Cox v. Peters, 342 U. S. 936, rehearing denied, 343 U. S. 921; Anderson v. Jordan, 343 U. S. 912; Kidd v. McCanless, 352 U. S. 920; Radford v. Gary, 352 U. S. 991; Hartsfield v. Sloan, 357 U. S. 916; Matthews v. Handley, 361 U. S. 127; Perry v. Folsom, 144 F. Supp. 874 (D. C. N. D. Ala.); Magraw v. Donovan, 163 F. Supp. 184 (D. C. D. Minn.); cf. Dyer v. Kazuhisa Abe, 138 F. Supp. 220 (D. C. D. Hawaii). And see Keogh v. Neely, 50 F. 2d 685 (…1 / 4
-
Gray v. Sanders, 372 U.S. 368 (U.S. 1963)…ty Unit System has previously been unsuccessfully challenged in this Court. Cook v. Fortson, decided with Turman v. Duckworth, 329 U. S. 675 (1946); South v. Peters, 339 U. S. 276 (1950); Cox v. Peters, 342 U. S. 936 (1952); and Hartsfield v. Sloan, 357 U. S. 916 (1958). It is true that none of these cases reached the stage of full plenary consideration but, in light of the judicial history recounted by Mr. Justice Frankfurter in his dissenting opinion in Baker v. Carr, supra, at 266, 278 et seq., only the…