HOUSE
v.
GRIMES, SHERIFF; GIROUX V. LANGLOIS, ACTING WARDEN; AND SANDERS V. MADIGAN, WARDEN, ET AL.

U.S. | 1958-06-16
Nos. 796; No. 801; No. 802
357 U.S. 916 Supreme Court of the United States (1958) Positive Treatment
Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (U.S. 1962)
    …d of Supervisors, 339 U. S. 940; Remmey v. Smith, 342 U. S. 916; Cox v. Peters, 342 U. S. 936, rehearing denied, 343 U. S. 921; Anderson v. Jordan, 343 U. S. 912; Kidd v. McCanless, 352 U. S. 920; Radford v. Gary, 352 U. S. 991; Hartsfield v. Sloan, 357 U. S. 916; Matthews v. Handley, 361 U. S. 127; Perry v. Folsom, 144 F. Supp. 874 (D. C. N. D. Ala.); Magraw v. Donovan, 163 F. Supp. 184 (D. C. D. Minn.); cf. Dyer v. Kazuhisa Abe, 138 F. Supp. 220 (D. C. D. Hawaii). And see Keogh v. Neely, 50 F. 2d 685 (…
    1 / 4
  • Gray v. Sanders, 372 U.S. 368 (U.S. 1963)
    …ty Unit System has previously been unsuccessfully challenged in this Court. Cook v. Fortson, decided with Turman v. Duckworth, 329 U. S. 675 (1946); South v. Peters, 339 U. S. 276 (1950); Cox v. Peters, 342 U. S. 936 (1952); and Hartsfield v. Sloan, 357 U. S. 916 (1958). It is true that none of these cases reached the stage of full plenary consideration but, in light of the judicial history recounted by Mr. Justice Frankfurter in his dissenting opinion in Baker v. Carr, supra, at 266, 278 et seq., only the…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw