NEW YORK CENTRAL RAILROAD CO.
v.
BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSIONERS OF NEW JERSEY ET AL.; ERIE RAILROAD CO. V. BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSIONERS OF NEW JERSEY ET AL.; AND NEW YORK, SUSQUEHANNA & WESTERN RAILROAD CO. V. BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSIONERS OF NEW JERSEY ET AL.
NEW YORK CENTRAL RAILROAD CO.
BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSIONERS OF NEW JERSEY ET AL.; ERIE RAILROAD CO. V. BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSIONERS OF NEW JERSEY ET AL.; AND NEW YORK, SUSQUEHANNA & WESTERN RAILROAD CO. V. BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSIONERS OF NEW JERSEY ET AL.
357 U.S. 917
Supreme Court of the United States (1958)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
In re The Cent. R.R. Co. OF NEW Jersey, 485 F.2d 208 (3d Cir. 1973)…2. . See e.g., Section 77(o), 11 U.S.C. § 205 (o). Compare Smith v. Hoboken R. Co., 328 U.S. 123, 66 S.Ct. 947, 90 L.Ed. 1123 (1946), with Board of Public Utility Com’rs of New Jersey v. United States, 158 F.Supp. 98 (D.N.J.1958), prob juris noted, 357 U.S. 917 (1958), dismissed as moot, 359 U.S. 982, 79 S.Ct. 939, 3 L.Ed.2d 932 (1958). 16a . For the purposes of the present appeal, this Court has assumed that the district court would have the power to permit termination of certain rail services if such t…
-
NEW Jersey v. New York, 372 U.S. 1 (U.S. 1963)…he Commission could not permit partial discontinuance of service over a line of railroad, whether the line crossed state boundaries or not. Board of Public Utility Comm’rs of New Jersey v. United States, 158 F. Supp. 98, probable jurisdiction noted, 357 U. S. 917, dismissed as moot, 359 U. S. 982.2 [*6] See Palmer v. Massachusetts, 308 U. S. 79, 84-85. Thus the Commission could not permit discontinuance of passenger operations while the railroad continued to carry-freight over the same line.3 As initially p…