EAGLE LION STUDIOS, INC., ET AL.

v.

LOEW'S INC. ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Richfield OIL Corp. v. Karseal Corp., 271 F.2d 709 (9th Cir. 1959)
  …rior judgment is not to be accepted as conclusive proof of the conspiracy found; it is merely prima facie evidence against which defendant is entitled to his day in court for the purpose of rebuttal. * * In Eagle Lion Studios, Inc. v. Loew’s, Inc., 358 U.S. 100, 79 S.Ct. 218, 3 L.Ed. 2d 147, the Supreme Court had granted certiorari on the question, “Were findings in the government’s prior antitrust suit prima facie evidence under Section 5 of the Clayton Act of conspiracy against the plaintiffs,” but the S…
• Int'l Shoe Mach. Corp. v. United Shoe Mach. Corp., 315 F.2d 449 (1st Cir. 1963)
  …American Tobacco Co., 197 F. 2d 629, 631 (2nd Cir., 1952), cert. denied, 344 U.S. 875, 73 S.Ct. 168, 97 L.Ed. 678. See, Eagle Lion Studios, Inc. v. Loew’s, Inc., 248 F. 2d 438, 444, 445 (2nd Cir., 1957), aff’d per curiam by an equally divided Court, 358 U.S. 100, 79 S.Ct. 218, 3 L.Ed.2d 147 (1958); Shotkin v. General Electric Co., 171 F. 2d 236, 238 (10th Cir., 1948). In short, before a plaintiff can invoke the mantle of Section 5 he must successfully meet both the statutory requirements of estoppel as well…
• Callman Gottesman v. Gen. Motors Corp. & E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co., 414 F.2d 956 (2d Cir. 1969)
  …ate suit, even though the period covered by each may differ. See, e. g., Park Neponset Corp. v. Smith, 258 F. 2d 452 (1st Cir. 1958); Eagle Lion Studios, Inc. v. Loew’s, Inc., 248 F. 2d 438, 442-445 (2d Cir. 1957), aff’d by an equally divided Court, 358 U.S. 100, 79 S.Ct. 218, 3 L.Ed.2d 147 (1958); Alamo Theatre Co. v. Loew’s Inc., 143 F.Supp. 419 (N.D.Ill.1956); Buckhead Theatre Co. v. Atlanta Enterprises, Inc., 327 F. 2d 365 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 888, 85 S.Ct. 158, 13 L.Ed.2d 92 (1964). Whi…