VAN NEWKIRK
v.
MCNEILL, SUPERINTENDENT, MATTEAWAN STATE HOSPITAL
VAN NEWKIRK
MCNEILL, SUPERINTENDENT, MATTEAWAN STATE HOSPITAL
358 U.S. 131
Supreme Court of the United States (1958)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
The appeal is dismissed.
Mr. Justice Frankfurter took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
McGOWAN v. Maryland, 366 U.S. 420 (U.S. 1961)…e of their duty to God, so necessary to make them good citizens; but which yet would be worn out and defaced by an unremitted continuance of labour, without any stated times of recalling them to the worship of their Maker.” See also Ullner v. Ohio, 358 U. S. 131; Kidd v. Ohio, 358 U. S. 132; McGee v. North Carolina, 346 U. S. 802; cf. Grochowiak v. Pennsylvania, 358 U. S. 47; Gundaker Cent. Motors, Inc., v. Gassert, 354 U. S. 933; Towery v. North Carolina, 347 U. S. 925. As respects the First Amendment the…1 / 4
-
Port Auth. Bondholders Protective Comm. v. Port OF NEW York Auth., 387 F.2d 259 (2d Cir. 1967)…in dismissing appeals only a few years before, Gundaker Central Motors, Inc. v. Gassert, 354 U.S. 933, 77 S.Ct. 1397, 1 L.Ed.2d 1533 (1957); Grochowiak v. Com. of Pennsylvania, 358 U.S. 47, 79 S.Ct. 40, 3 L.Ed.2d 44 (1958) ; Ullner v. State of Ohio, 358 U.S. 131, 79 S.Ct. 230, 3 L.Ed.2d 225 (1958) ; and Kidd v. State of Ohio, 358 U.S. 132, 79 S.Ct. 235, 3 L.Ed.2d 225 (1958). However, unless and until the Supreme Court should instruct otherwise, inferior federal courts had best adhere to the view that if th…