SMITH
v.
UNITED STATES

U.S. | 1959-01-12
No. 192
Mr. Justice Frankfurter took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
358 U.S. 281 Supreme Court of the United States (1959) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases

Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated and the case is remanded to the District Court with directions to allow the appeal in forma pauperis. Ellis v. United States, 356 U. S. 674.

Mr. Justice Frankfurter took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438 (U.S. 1962)
    …nited States, 355 U. S. 36; Ellis v. United States, 356 U. S. 674; Hill v. United States, 356 U. S. 704; Cash v. United States, 357 U. S. 219; Hansford v. United States, 357 U. S. 578; Kitchens v. United States, 358 U. S. 42; Smith v. United States, 358 U. S. 281; Smith v. United States, 361 U. S. 13; Smith v. United States, 361 U. S. 38; McAbee v. United States, 361 U. S. 537; Lurk v. United States, 366 U. S. 712. See also Page v. United States, 359 U. S. 116; Willis v. United States, 362 U. S. 216. Cf. S…
  • Smith v. United States, 283 F.2d 607 (D.C. Cir. 1960)
    …nuary 12, 1959 — three years after conviction — the Supreme Court vacated the order of this court and remanded the case to the District Court with instructions to allow this appeal (No. 15080) in forma pauperis from the judgment of conviction. 1959, 358 U.S. 281, 79 S.Ct. 322, 3 L.Ed.2d 299. I agree with the court that the corpus delicti was proved2 and that the appeal from the judgment of conviction must be affirmed. Much more difficult questions are raised by appellant’s appeal No. 15540 from the Distric…
    1 / 2

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw