CHAFFIN ET AL.

v.

CALIFORNIA

Citator

Cited By

• Anderson v. Ellison, 285 F.2d 484 (10th Cir. 1960)
  …roduction of oil and gas from a common source of supply. Anderson v. Corporation Comm., Okl., 327 P. 2d 699. An appeal to the Supreme Court of the United States was dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Anderson v. Corporation Comm., 358 U.S. 642, 79 S.Ct. 536, 3 L.Ed.2d 567. The complaint sets forth the entire proceedings before the Commission; alleges that the plaintiff Anderson was the owner of a portion of the unit; and, although admitting that the offer was made after the time fixed in…
• Youngblood v. Hughes Seewald, 299 F.2d 680 (10th Cir. 1961)
  …ntly upheld as a proper exercise of the state’s police power. Anderson v. Ellison, 10 Cir., 285 F. 2d 484; Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. Isaacson, 10 Cir., 255 F. 2d 669; Anderson v. Corporation Commission, Okl., 327 P. 2d 699, appeal dismissed 358 U.S. 642, 79 S.Ct. 536, 3 L.Ed.2d 567; Wakefield v. State, Okl., 306 P. 2d 305; Patterson v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co., 182 Okl. 155, 77 P. 2d 83, appeal dismissed 305 U.S. 376, 59 S.Ct. 259, 83 L.Ed. 231. See Anno. 37 A.L.R.2d 434 (1954). The form of the orde…
• Tyler v. The Superior OIL Co., 322 F.2d 479 (10th Cir. 1963)
  …. 7, of the Oklahoma Constitution. We find nothing in the case that suggests a federal constitutional question or brings the issue beyond the scope of Anderson v. Corporation Commission, Okl., 327 P. 2d 699, dismissed for want of a federal question. 358 U.S. 642, 79 S.Ct. 536, 3 L.Ed.2d 567. The judgment is affirmed upon the authority of Crews Oil Company v. Superior Oil Company, 10 Cir., 319 F. 2d 532, and cases cited therein.…