UNITED STATES

v.

HALEY

Citator

Cited By

• Perez v. United States, 402 U.S. 146 (U.S. 1971)
  …licit threat of use, of violence or other criminal means to cause harm to the person, reputation, or property of any person.” That decision has been followed: Beckman v. Mall, 317 U. S. 597; Bender v. Wickard, 319 U. S. 731; United States v. Haley, 358 U. S. 644; United States v. Ohio, 385 U. S. 9. See n. 2, supra. See n. 1, supra.…
• United States v. Haley, 371 U.S. 18 (U.S. 1962)
  …er of the District Court, dated February 26, 1962, denying the motion of the United States for judgment in this action evidently rested on a misconception of the scope and effect of this Court’s per curiam opinion on the Government’s earlier appeal, 358 U. S. 644, and of its judgment issued February 24, 1959. In light of the issues tendered in the papers filed on that appeal there can be no doubt that this Court’s judgment finally established the Government’s right to the relief sought in this action, subje…
• Siegent Caulfield v. U. S. Dep't OF Agric., 293 F.2d 217 (5th Cir. 1961)
  …Farm Program constitutionally rest on the Commerce Clause, Article 1, § 8, Clause 3 of the Constitution, jurisdiction would likely exist under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1337 as to which there is no requisite amount in controversy. United States v. Haley, 1959, 358 U.S. 644, 79 S.Ct. 537, 3 L.Ed.2d 567; Wickard v. Filburn, 1942, 317 U.S. 111, 63 S.Ct. 82, 87 L.Ed. 122.…

Authorities Cited

• Wickard v. Filburn, 317 U.S. 111 (U.S. 1942)