SAFEWAY STORES, INC.,

v.

OKLAHOMA RETAIL GROCERS ASSOCIATION, INC., ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Harrison v. Nat'l Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People, 360 U.S. 167 (U.S. 1959)
  …es a reasonable time within which to obtain a state interpretation. . The Commonwealth defendants, proceeding under 28 U. S. C. § 1253, appealed to this Court the lower court’s disposition of Chapters 31, 32, and 35. We noted probable jurisdiction. 358 U. S. 807. NAACP and Fund did not appeal the disposition of Chapters 33 and 36. • The three Virginia statutes before us are lengthy, detailed, and sweeping. Chapters 31 and 32 are registration statutes. Chapter 31 deals with the rendering of financial assist…
• Martin v. Creasy, 360 U.S. 219 (U.S. 1959)
  …njoining, in the most sweeping terms, the Secretary of Highways and the Governor from proceeding. Creasy, v. Stevens, 160 F. Supp. 404.4 The case is here by way of a direct appeal, 28 U. S. C. § 1253, of which this Court noted probable jurisdiction. 358 U. S. 807. It was the clear pronouncement of the Pennsylvania courts that the state statute provides a complete procedure to guard and protect the plaintiffs’ constitutional rights “at all times.” In the light of this pronouncement it is difficult to perceiv…
• Safeway Stores, Inc. v. Okla. Retail Grocers Ass'n, Inc., 360 U.S. 334 (U.S. 1959)
  …Safeway and denied relief against appellees. On appeal, the Supreme Court of Oklahoma affirmed, 322 P. 2d 179, and since the constitutionality of [*336] the state statute was challenged under the Fourteenth Amendment, we noted probable jurisdiction, 358 U. S. 807, and brought the case here under 28 U. S. C. § 1257 (2). Safeway makes two main claims. 1. Safeway justified cutting prices below cost in some cities by claiming it was to meet the prices of some of its competitors who were also selling below cost…