MILLS ET AL.

v.

LOUISIANA; AND MILLS V. LOUISIANA

Citator

Cited By

• T. I. M. E. Inc. v. United States, 359 U.S. 464 (U.S. 1959)
  …that the result reached by the Courts of Appeals [*468] conflicted with* this Court’s decision in Montana-Dakota Utilities Co. v. Northwestern Pub. Serv. Co., 341 U. S. 246, and in order to settle thé questions of statutory interpretation involved.4 358 U. S. 810. The courts below held that the right of the United States to resist on the ground of unreasonableness the payment of the charges incurred by it was one deriving from the common law and preserved by § 216 (j) of the Motor Carrier' Act.5 In this Cou…
• Farmers Educ. & Coop. Union of Am. v. Wday, Inc., 360 U.S. 525 (U.S. 1959)
  …ments made by the speakers.” For. this reason it held that the state libel laws could not apply to WDAY. 89 N. W. 2d 102, 110. We granted certiorari because the questions decided are important to the administration of the Federal Communications Act. 358 U. S. 810. I. Petitioner argues that § 315’s prohibition against censorship leaves broadcasters free to delete libelous material from candidates’ speeches, and that therefore no federal immunity is granted a broadcasting station by that sec-tion. The term c…
• Serv. Storage & Transfer Co., Inc. v. Virginia, 359 U.S. 171 (U.S. 1959)
  …th its interstate certificate as well as an interpretation thereof by the Interstate Commerce Commission. It claims that respondent was without power thus to impose criminal sanctions on its certificated interstate operations. We granted certiorari, 358 U. S. 810, to.test out the conflicting contentions. We agree with the petitioner that under the facts here the interpretation of petitioner’s interstate commerce certificate should first be litigated before the Interstate Commerce Commission under the provisi…