FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

v.

MANDEL BROTHERS, INC.

Citator

Cited By

• Fed. Trade Comm'n v. Mandel Bros., Inc., 359 U.S. 385 (U.S. 1959)
  …n the meaning of the Act1; and second, it struck from the order the prohibition against misbranding through omission of the three categories as to which no violations were found. 254 F. 2d 18. The case is here on a petition for a writ of certiorari. 358 U. S. 812. I. First, as to invoicing. We start with an Act whose avowed purpose, inter alia, was to protect “consumers . . . against deception, . . . resulting from the misbranding, false or deceptive advertising, or false invoicing of fur products and furs…
• Robert C. Herd & Co., Inc. v. Krawill Mach. Corp., 359 U.S. 297 (U.S. 1959)
  …n A. M. Collins & Co. v. Panama R. Co., 197 F. 2d 893, saying that it thought the dissenting opinion in that case presented the correct view. The question being of importance to the shipping industry, we granted certiorari to resolve this conflict. 358 U. S. 812. Petitioner's contentions are twofold. First, it contends that the liability-limiting provisions of the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act and of the bill of lading should be construed to limit its liability as well as that of the carrier. Second, it c…
• Arroyo v. United States, 359 U.S. 419 (U.S. 1959)
  …judgment of conviction was affirmed by the Court of Appeals for the First Circuit. 256 F. 2d 549. Certiorari was granted because the case presents an important question as to the scope of this provision of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947. 358 U. S. 812. The facts are substantially undisputed. In 1953 the petitioner was president of a union which represented the employees of two affiliated corporations. In that capacity he negotiated a collective bargaining agreement with the employers. This agree…