ALKER

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Harney v. William M. Moore Bldg. Corp. & Lopier Constr. Corp., 359 F.2d 649 (2d Cir. 1966)
  …2 L.Ed. 1152 (1948). . Smith v. The Mormacdale, 198 F. 2d 849 (3 Cir. 1952), cert. den. 345 U.S. 908, 73 S.Ct. 648, 97 L.Ed. 1344 (1953); Bennett v. The Mormacteal, 160 F.Supp. 840 (E.D.N.Y.1957), aff’d per curiam 254 F. 2d 138 (2 Cir.), cert. den. 358 U.S. 817, 79 S.Ct. 26, 3 L.Ed.2d 59 (1958); Bynum v. The Mormacteal, 188 F.Supp. 763 (E.D.Pa.1960). (Reed v. The Yaka, 373 U.S. 410, 83 S.Ct. 1349, 10 L.Ed.2d 448 (1963), qualifies the doctrine of these cases.) . Section 905 reads, in relevant part, “The li…
• Codex Corp. v. Milgo Elec. Corp., 717 F.2d 622 (1st Cir. 1983)
  …ion or an erroneous conception of law. St. Regis Paper Co. v. Royal Industries, 552 F. 2d 309, 316 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 996, 98 S.Ct. 633, 54 L.Ed.2d 490 (1977); Graham v. Jeoffroy Mfg., Inc., 253 F. 2d 72, 78 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 817, 79 S.Ct. 28, 3 L.Ed.2d 59 (1958). Attorney fees are usually awarded under § 285 “only where the district court finds strong evidence of unfairness and bad faith on the part of the losing party.” Colortronic Reinhard & Co. v. Plastic Controls, 668…
• Henry Hanger & Display Fixture Corp. OF Am. v. Sel-O-Rak Corp., 270 F.2d 635 (5th Cir. 1959)
  …mpany v. Livesay Industries, Inc., supra. Profits of the infringer are evidence of the damages' sustained by the holder of the patent and may be the measure of damages. Graham v. Jeoffroy Mfg. Co., Inc., 5 Cir., 1958, 253 F. 2d 72, certiorari denied 358 U.S. 817, 79 S.Ct. 28, 3 L.Ed.2d 59, rehearing denied 358 U.S. 890, 79 S.Ct. 117, 3 L.Ed.2d 118. Where, as here, the infringer’s profits are taken as the measure of the plaintiff’s loss, a royalty should not be included to increase the award of damages. Lask…