REYNOLDS

v.

ROYAL MAIL LINES, LTD., ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Joseph v. Manning, 329 F.2d 32 (2d Cir. 1964)
  …of employment.” N. L. R. B. v. Reed & Prince Mfg. Co., 205 F. 2d 131, 136 (1 Cir.), cert. denied, 346 U.S. 887, 74 S.Ct. 139, 98 L.Ed. 391 (1953); cf. Switchmen’s Union of North America v. Southern Pac. Co., 253 F. 2d 81, 84 (9 Cir.), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 818, 79 S.Ct. 29, 3 L.Ed.2d 60 (1958). The purpose of § 6 was to prevent rocking of the boat by either side until the procedures of the Railway Labor Act were exhausted ; interpreting “working conditions” to include an agreed check-off accomplishes that…
• Brotherhood OF Locomotive Firemen AND Enginemen v. N. Pac. Ry. Co., 274 F.2d 641 (8th Cir. 1960)
  …can be paid only to, the labor organization representing the craft or class of employees. That labor organization here is the appellant Brotherhood. Switchmen’s Union of North America v. Southern Pacific Co., 9 Cir., 253 F. 2d 81, certiorari denied, 358 U.S. 818, 79 S. Ct. 29, 3 L.Ed.2d 60; petition for rehearing denied, 358 U.S. 896, 79 S. Ct. 152, 3 L.Ed.2d 123, supports this conclusion, for there the court said, at page 84 of 253 F. 2d: “We think that in making the dues check-off agreement with the Trai…
• Leoda Newport v. Cincinnati, 509 F.2d 1246 (6th Cir. 1975)
  …general rule, “[t]he law in Tennessee, as elsewhere, provides that whether or not a plaintiff acted with due care is [a question] for determination by the jury.” Doane Agricultural Service, Inc. v. Coleman, 254 F. 2d 40, 43 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 818, 79 S.Ct. 29, 3 L.Ed.2d 60 (1958), citing Osborn v. City of Nashville, 182 Tenn. 197, 185 S.W. 2d 510 (1945). Nevertheless, in some cases, where reasonable minds could reach only one conclusion — -that plaintiff failed to exercise ordinary care and…