J. C. PENNEY CO.
v.
THACKER

U.S. | 1958-10-13
No. 118
358 U.S. 820 Supreme Court of the United States (1958) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • AETNA Ins. Co. v. Neville G. Penrose, Inc., 304 F.2d 612 (5th Cir. 1962)
    …nvitee to “take reasonable care to discover the actual condition of the premises and either make them safe or warn him of dangerous conditions.” Restatement, Torts § 343 (1934). Thacker v. J. C. Penney Co., 5 Cir., 1958, 254 F. 2d 672, cert. denied, 358 U.S. 820, 79 S.Ct. 31, 3 L.Ed.2d 61. From this misplaced springboard, the plaintiff attempts an impossible double gainer to show that the defendant Penrose impliedly warranted that no accident would befall the plaintiff during the sand fracturing operation.…
  • Ellis v. K-Lan Co., Inc., 695 F.2d 157 (5th Cir. 1983)
    …the child’s parents is not imputed to the child so as to bar the child’s cause of action for personal injuries. Lowery v. Berry, 153 Tex. 411, 269 S.W. 2d 795, 797 (1954); Thacker v. J.C. Penney Co., 254 F. 2d 672, 679 (5th Cir.1958), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 820, 79 S.Ct. 31, 3 L.Ed.2d 61 (1959). A parent’s recovery of medical expenses incurred on behalf of a child, however, may be reduced or defeated by the parent’s own contributory negligence. Head v. Coleman, 470 S.W. 2d 380 (Tex.Civ.App.— [*163] Waco 19…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw