AGHNIDES

v.

AGHNIDES

Citator

Cited By (18 total)

• Peninsular Fire Ins. Co. v. Wells, 438 So. 2d 46 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983)
  …overed risk of barratry and the seizure exclusion is also treated in The Republic of China v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh, 151 F.Supp. 211 (D.Md.1957), aff'd. in part and rev’d. in part, 254 F. 2d 177 (4th Cir.1958), cert. denied 358 U.S. 823, 79 S.Ct. 38, 3 L.Ed.2d 64 (1958). . “In case of any loss or misfortune, it shall be lawful and necessary for the assured, their factors, servants, and assigns, to sue, labor and travel for, in and about the defense, safeguard and recovery of the v…
• United States v. Radetsky, 535 F.2d 556 (10th Cir. 1976)
  …ase, which the defendant could not do in his behalf. We must agree that submission of the bill of particulars to a trial jury is undesirable. The authority relied on by the Government, Shayne v. United States, 255 F. 2d 739 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 823, 79 S.Ct. 39, 3 L.Ed.2d 64, is not persuasive. On appeal the defendants there argued that it was error to send the indictment to the jury without a bill of particulars, this resulting in eliminating others as conspirators except the two appellants.…
• United States v. Warner, 428 F.2d 730 (8th Cir. 1970)
  …returns with IRS audit reports attached which allegedly were not admitted into evidence. The sending of an indictment to a jury room is within the discretion of the trial judge. Shayne v. United States, 255 F. 2d 739 (9th Cir. 1958), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 823, 79 S.Ct. 39, 3 L.Ed.2d 64. However, in the case at bar, unlike Shayne, the indictment delivered to the jury contained 4 counts which had been dismissed. It seems equally apparent that accusations of crimes other than those charged are not competent…