MINNESOTA
v.
ADAMS ET AL.
MINNESOTA
ADAMS ET AL.
358 U.S. 826
Supreme Court of the United States (1958)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Vesterso, 828 F.2d 1234 (8th Cir. 1987)…ams and lakes is quite a different matter from the right to control waters.” North Dakota State Water Comm’n v. Board of Managers, 332 N.W. 2d 254, 258 (N.D.1983) (quoting State v. Adams, 251 Minn. 521, 546, 89 N.W. 2d 661, 678 (1957), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 826, 79 S.Ct. 45, 3 L.Ed.2d 67 (1958)) (emphasis added). While North Dakota may own the beds under navigable streams and lakes, see United Plainsmen, 247 N.W. 2d at 461, its ownership has not been interpreted to extend to beds of nonnavigable watercou…