MASON

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (16 total)

• Epoch Producing Corp. v. Killiam Shows, Inc., 522 F.2d 737 (2d Cir. 1975)
  …Witmark & Sons, 318 U.S. 643, 63 S.Ct. 773, 87 L.Ed. 1055 (1943), which is “a separate interest distinct from the original copyright,” Edward B. Marks Music Corp. v. Charles K. Harris Music Pub. Co., Inc., 255 F. 2d 518, 521 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 831, 79 S.Ct. 51, 3 L.Ed.2d 69 (1958). The right of renewal is determined exclusively by 17 U.S.C. § 24, reproduced in note 1, supra, which provides that the renewal may be obtained by (1) the proprietor of the original term copyright, in the case of c…
• United States v. Brown, 411 F.2d 1134 (10th Cir. 1969)
  …an examination of a witness who himself was admittedly under investigation as a prospective defendant for prosecution and thus had a lurking penal interest to protect but did not do so. See Mason v. United States, 10 Cir., 257 F. 2d 359, cert. den. 358 U.S. 831, 79 S.Ct. 52, 3 L. Ed.2d 69, and cases cited. It seems abundantly clear that the statement was not subject to the basic dangers that premise the exclusion of hearsay and that the unavailability of the witness to repeat his testimony at trial has all…
• ST. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. United States for the Use of Dakota Elec. Supply Co., 309 F.2d 22 (8th Cir. 1962)
  …ted States for Use and Benefit of Robertson Lumber Co., 8 Cir., 1962, 305 F. 2d 794, 797 (petition for certiorari pending); United States for Use and Benefit of Hopper Bros. Quarries v. Peerless Cas. Co., 8 Cir., 1958, 255 F. 2d 137, 143, cert. den. 358 U.S. 831, 79 S.Ct. 51, 3 L.Ed.2d 69. It has even been said that the Act was not designed to protect general contractors. St. Paul-Mercury Indem. Co. v. United States for Use of Jones, 10 Cir., 1956, 238 F. 2d 917, 921. 4. Where, as here, there are outstandi…