IN RE COOPER

Citator

Cited By

• Rood v. United States, 340 F.2d 506 (8th Cir. 1965)
  …: Edwards v. United States, 333 F. 2d 588 (8th Cir. 1964); Rosenbloom v. United States, 259 F. 2d 500 (8th Cir. 1958), cert. denied 358 U.S. 929, 79 S.Ct. 315, 3 L.Ed.2d 302 (1959); Cofer v. United States, 256 F. 2d 221 (8th Cir. 1958), cert. denied 358 U.S. 840, 79 S.Ct. 65, 3 L.Ed.2d 75 (1958); McDonough v. United States, 248 F. 2d 725 (8th Cir. 1957); Mitchell v. United States, 208 F. 2d 854 (8th Cir. 1954), cert. denied 347 U.S. 1012, 74 S.Ct. 863, 98 L.Ed. 1135 (1954); Lucas v. United States, 325 F. 2d…
• Miller v. United States, 354 F.2d 801 (8th Cir. 1966)
  …” See, also, Giordenello v. United States, 1958, 357 U.S. 480, 78 S.Ct. 1245, 2 L.Ed. 2d 1503; United States v. Di Re, 1948, 332 U.S. 581, 68 S.Ct. 222, 92 L.Ed. 210; Cofer v. United States, 8 Cir., 1958, 256 F. 2d 221, 222, 223, certiorari denied, 358 U.S. 840, 79 S.Ct. 65, 3 L.Ed.2d 75. We do not deem it necessary to remand this case for a hearing on the Escobedo point since, even if we consider appellant’s Escobedo objection on its merits,4 we do not feel that she falls within the purview of that decis…
• Anti-Monopoly, Inc. v. Gen. Mills FUN Grp., 611 F.2d 296 (9th Cir. 1979)
  …3, 1186, 1188-89 (2d Cir. 1975) (finding consideration for settlement agreement in possibility, strongly intimated by the district judge, that game name CARROM [*305] invalid); Application of Cooper, 254 F. 2d 611, 614-17, 45 CCPA 923, cert. denied, 358 U.S. 840, 79 S.Ct. 63, 3 L.Ed.2d 75 (1958) (holding a book title generic, because as the book’s name it performs a product-denoting, not source-denoting function; observing that Patent Office may be registering names of games erroneously; and stating that if…