ELAM

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Chira v. Lockheed Aircraft Corp., 634 F.2d 664 (2d Cir. 1980)
  …nt counsel under such dire circumstances aside, the excuse falters in the face of Solomon’s undoubted energy at Chira’s deposition on April 9 and 10. Cf. Edmond v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc., 253 F. 2d 143, 144 (2d Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 848, 79 S.Ct. 73, 3 L.Ed.2d 82 (1958). We are similarly not swayed by Solomon’s statement that he was occupied by legal work for a deceased friend’s estate, cf. Bardin v. Mondon, 298 F. 2d 235 (2d Cir. 1961), and by his involvement in four of his own ca…
• United States v. Samson Eisner (Principal) & United Bonding Ins. Co. (Surety), 323 F.2d 38 (6th Cir. 1963)
  …to hear and rule on the motion of June 26, 1962. Rules 37(a) (1) and 39(a), Rules of Criminal Procedure; United States v. Frank B. Killian Co., 269 F. 2d 491, 494, C.A.6th; Edmond v. Moore-McCormack Lines, 253 F. 2d 143, 144, C.A.2nd, cert. denied, 358 U.S. 848, 79 S.Ct. 73, 3 L.Ed.2d 82; Peterman v. Indian Motorcycle Co., 216 F. 2d 289, 291, C.A.lst. Reference by counsel to what took place and what was said at this hearing is, accordingly, not before the Court on this review. It appears that this motion w…
• Johnson v. United States, 405 F.2d 1072 (D.C. Cir. 1968)
  …D.C. 4, 6-7, 206 F. 2d 479, 481-482 (1953); Randolph v. Randolph, 91 U.S.App.D.C. 170, 198 F. 2d 956 (1952); Boykin v. Huff, 73 App.D.C. 378, 121 F. 2d 865 (1941). Cf. Kirksey v. United States, 94 U.S.App.D.C. 393, 219 F. 2d 499 (1954), cert. denied 358 U.S. 848, 79 S.Ct. 74, 3 L.Ed.2d 82 (1958). . Advisory Committee’s Note to F.R.Crim.P. 37(a) (2) ¶ 5. . See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 441-442, 82 S.Ct. 917, 8 L.Ed.2d 21 (1962). . F.R.Crim.P. 32(a) (2). . Ibid. . Unless the right is intel…