PACIFIC FAR EAST LINE, INC.,

v.

UNITED STATES ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (26 total)

• Arellanes v. United States, 302 F.2d 603 (9th Cir. 1962)
  …usive control or dominion over property on which contraband narcotics are found is a strong circumstance tending to prove knowledge of the presence of such narcotics and control thereof. Evans v. United States, 257 F. 2d 121 (9th Cir.) cert. denied, 358 U.S. 866, 79 S.Ct. 98, 3 L.Ed.2d 99 (1958); People v. Antista, 129 Cal.App.2d 47, 276 P. 2d 177 (1954). On the other hand, mere proximity to the drug,3 mere presence on the property where it is located,4 or mere association, without more, with the person w…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• United States v. Dunn, 564 F.2d 348 (9th Cir. 1977)
  …en William and Josephine, who handled the heroin in question. But guilt may not be inferred from mere association. Ong Way Jong v. United States, 9 Cir., 245 F. 2d 392, 394.” Evans v. United States, 257 F. 2d 121, 126 (9th Cir. 1958), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 866, 79 S.Ct. 98, 3 L.Ed.2d 99 (1958); accord, United States v. Kompinski, 373 F. 2d 429 (2d Cir. 1967). More recently, we emphasized: “Neither mere association and activity with a co-conspirator nor even knowledge of the conspiracy’s existence — not p…
• United States v. Alphonse Sisca, 503 F.2d 1337 (2d Cir. 1974)
  …rence that Hoke performed the critical role of maintaining the “stash” or “safe haven” for the distribution operation. United States v. Terrell, 474 F. 2d 872, 875 (2 Cir. 1973); cf. Evans v. United States, 257 F. 2d 121, 128 (9 Cir.), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 866 (1958). Further, the suggestion that members of a conspiracy would entrust $60,000 in cash and a large quantity of narcotics to one who was not a full partner strains credulity. United States v. Terrell, supra, 474 F. 2d at 875. Finally, when consid…