PROUTY ET AL.

v.

CITIZENS UTILITIES CO.

Citator

Cited By (12 total)

• Kuba v. Samuel L. LEB, M.D., 464 So. 2d 601 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)
  …within the trial court’s discretion to permit one of the defendant-doctors to cross-examine the plaintiffs’ expert witness notwithstanding that the defendants were represented by counsel, see Brasier v. Jeary, 256 F. 2d 474 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 867, 79 S.Ct. 97, 3 L.Ed.2d 99 (1958); State v. Tait, 387 So. 2d 338 (Fla.1980); State v. McCleary, 149 N.J.Super. 77, 373 A. 2d 400 (App.Div.), cert. denied, 75 N.J. 26, 379 A. 2d 257 (1977), and we find no abuse of that discretion here. We find appell…
• Peterson v. Isadore Nadler, 452 F.2d 754 (8th Cir. 1971)
  …hts cases4; district courts throughout the country do the same. It is true that there exists no statutory or constitutional right for an indigent to have counsel appointed in a civil case. Brasier v. Jeary, 256 F. 2d 474 (8 Cir. 1958), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 867, 79 S.Ct. 97, 3 L.Ed.2d 99.5 We have affirmed this principle many times. Still, federal courts do possess the statutory power to make this appointment, if within the court’s discretion the circumstances are such that would properly justify it. This…
• United States v. Conder, 423 F.2d 904 (6th Cir. 1970)
  …enied, 393 U.S. 1094, 89 S.Ct. 865, 21 L.Ed.2d 785 (1969); Sanchez v. United States, 311 F. 2d 327, 333 (9th Cir. 1962), cert. denied, 373 U.S. 949, 83 S.Ct. 1678, 10 L.Ed.2d 704 (1963); Brasier v. Jeary, 256 F. 2d 474, 478 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 867, 79 S.Ct. 97, 3 L.Ed.2d 99 (1958). In this case five defendants were being jointly tried under a twelve-count indictment involving a rather complicated factual pattern. Each of the five defendants was represented by a separate attorney. Under thes…