ORR

v.

ILLINOIS

Citator

Cited By

• FAY v. Noia, 372 U.S. 391 (U.S. 1963)
  …t Court on habeas corpus to make a proper record. Bullock v. South Carolina, 365 U. S. 292. And so in a number of cases the Court has apparently excused compliance with the requirement. See, e. g., Weston v. Sigler, 361 U. S. 37; Bailey v. Arkansas, 358 U. S. 869; Poret v. Sigler, 355 U. S. 60; Massey v. Moore, 348 U. S. 105. Cf. Thomas v. Arizona, 356 U. S. 390, 392, n. 1. The same practice has sometimes been followed in the Federal District Courts. See Reitz, Federal Habeas Corpus: Postconviction Remedy fo…
• Bailey v. Henslee, 287 F.2d 936 (8th Cir. 1961)
  …29 Ark. 74, 313 S.W. 2d 388. Again cer-tiorari was denied by the United States Supreme Court but this time “without prejudice to an application for a writ of habeas corpus in an appropriate United States District Court.” Bailey v. State of Arkansas, 358 U.S. 869, 79 S.Ct. 101, 3 L.Ed.2d 101. (c) The first federal court proceeding and appeal. Pursuant to this suggestion by the Supreme Court, Bailey filed his second petition for a writ of habeas corpus. This one was presented to the United States District Co…
• Bailey v. Henslee, 309 F.2d 840 (8th Cir. 1962)
  …58, 168 F.Supp. 314; Bailey v. Henslee, 1960, 184 F.Supp. 298. . Bailey v. Henslee, 8 Cir., 1959, 264 F. 2d 744; Bailey v. Henslee, 1961, 287 F. 2d 936. . Bailey v. Arkansas, 1957, 355 U.S. 851, 78 S.Ct. 77, 2 L.Ed.2d 59; Bailey v. Arkansas, 1958, 358 U.S. 869, 79 S.Ct. 101, 3 L.Ed.2d 101; Bailey v. Henslee, 1960, 361 U.S. 945, 80 S.Ct. 408, 4 L.Ed.2d 364; Henslee v. Bailey, 1961, 368 U.S. 877, 82 S.Ct. 121, 7 L.Ed.2d 78. . But our interpretation of the scope of our mandate is not necessarily controlling…