SHARGAA

v.

FLORIDA

Citator

Cited By

• State v. Benigo Fernandez, 156 So. 2d 400 (Fla. 2d DCA 1963)
  …693. However, in view of apparent confusion with respect to these questions, some elaboration would seem appropriate, particularly with respect to the distinction between the instant case and Shargaa v. State, Fla.1958, 102 So. 2d 814, cert. denied 358 U.S. 873, 79 S.Ct. 114, 3 L.Ed.2d 104. In State v. Curtis, supra, we determined that an allegation of previous conviction of a lottery law violation was not merely a permissive but a necessary element of an information seeking conviction under Fla. Stat. §…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• United States v. Davis, 562 F.2d 681 (D.C. Cir. 1977)
  …the drugs. Juries may use their common sense to look through testimony and draw inferences from all the surrounding circumstances that may conflict with specific statements. Cf. Giacona v. United States, 257 F. 2d 450, 454 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 873, 79 S.Ct. 113, 3 L.Ed.2d 104 (1958). The jury found, and the dissent agrees, that there was sufficient evidence to support appellant’s conviction for possession of hashish. The testimony that proves possession of the contraband specified in the ot…
• Cohen v. United States, 405 F.2d 34 (8th Cir. 1968)
  …1, 34-35 (1966); Hewitt, The Constitutional Rights of the Taxpayer in a Fraud Investigation, 44 Taxes 660, 661-62 (1966). . United States v. Wheeler, 149 F.Supp. 445, 450 (W.D.Pa.1957), rev’d on other grounds, 256 F. 2d 745 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 873, 79 S.Ct. 111, 3 L.Ed.2d 103 (1958): “ * * * [T]he law distinguishes between failure on the part of a government investigator to disclose the purpose of his investigation at its inception when suspicion of criminal wrongdoing exists and the discove…