BELL

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (36 total)

• Chaney v. State, 237 So. 2d 281 (Fla. 4th DCA 1970)
  …date an arrest where the facts, when measured by the standard mentioned above, provided reasonable grounds for the arrest without a warrant under the pertinent statute. Bell v. United States, 1957, 102 U.S. App.D.C. 383, 254 F. 2d 82, 86 (cert. den. 358 U.S. 885, 79 S.Ct. 126, 3 L.Ed.2d 113); Simms v. State, 1968, 4 Md.App. 160, 242 A. 2d 185, 189; Hoskins v. State, Fla.App. 1968, 208 So. 2d 145. Any other rule would be an unjustified preference of form over substance. It is a well established principle in…
• Bailey v. United States, 389 F.2d 305 (D.C. Cir. 1967)
  …29, 3 L.Ed. 2d 327 (1959). The standard is that of “a reasonable, cautious and prudent peace officer” and must be judged in the light of his experience and training. Bell v. United States, 102 U.S.App.D.C. 383, 387, 254 F. 2d 82, 86, cert. denied, 358 U.S. 885, 79 S.Ct. 126, 3 L.Ed.2d 113 (1958). The police must have enough information to “warrant a man of reasonable caution in the belief” that a crime has been committed and that the person arrested has committed it. Carroll v. United States, 267 U.S. 1…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Klingler v. United States, 409 F.2d 299 (8th Cir. 1969)
  …5 U.S.App.D.C. 43, 365 F. 2d 976 (1966); Feguer v. United States, 302 F. 2d 214, 245-248 (8th Cir. 1962), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 872, 83 S.Ct. 123, 9 L.Ed.2d 110 (1962); Bell v. United States, 102 U.S.App.D.C. 383, 254 F. 2d 82 (1958), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 885, 79 S.Ct. 126, 3 L.Ed.2d 113, reh. denied, 358 U.S. 923, 79 S.Ct. 292, 3 L.Ed.2d 242 (1958). Cf. Wainright v. City of New Orleans, 392 U.S. 598, 599, 88 S.Ct. 2243, 20 L.Ed.2d 1322 (1968). (Mr. Justice Fortas, in a concurring opinion, suggested th…